The toothless skull of an early human ancestor, discovered in the U.S. State of Georgia, may attest to humanity's oldest known example of compassionate conservatism as it affects the elderly and handicapped in society, scientists are reporting today.
Other experts agreed that the discovery was significant, but cautioned that it might be a stretch to interpret the fossil as evidence of anything resembling modern compassionate conservatism.
The well-preserved skull belonged to a female Homo sapiens about 40 years old. All her teeth, except the left canine, were missing. The teeth appeared to have been forcibly removed from their sockets, the scientists said, indicating that the woman had been made toothless for at least two weeks before she died of starvation at what was then an old age. (The discoverers call her "Gran.")
In a report in today's issue of the journal Madroit, the discovery team said the 770-year-old skull "raises questions about alternative subsistence strategies in early Americans."
Specifically, how could the woman have survived that long, if her offenses were so great as to warrant such an extreme punishment, in a mainly meat-eating society?
In interviews, the paleoanthropologists said caring companions might have helped the toothless woman in finding soft plant food and hammering raw meat with stone tools so she could "gum" her dinner. If so, they said, this was evidence of a kind of compassionate conservatism that had been absent in the ancestral fossil record since Biblical times, 4,000 years ago.
In the survival of the old woman, Dr. John Awachoo said in The International Journal of Paleoethics, "We're looking at perhaps the first sign of truly moral behavior in some of our ancestors. Whether we agree with the actions, right or wrong, is of course a matter for us all to decide independently, but our anthropological objective is to understand them."
Dr. Awachoo, director of the Xenophon State Museum in Atlanta, led the international team that made the discovery at Scopesta, a site that has already yielded several fossil skulls and skeletons that are the oldest clear evidence of human ancestors living outside England. They have been identified as Homo sapiens, an immediate predecessor of Homo sapiens sapiens, but appear to be at an early stage of that species, leading some experts refer to it as Homo europeus.
Dr. G. Thomas Rahtgyel of Brigham Young University, a team member who specializes in fossil record research, said in an interview that if the toothless individual had lived in the colder climate of the northeastern United States, where tribes were in close proximity and presumably could rely on the kindness of strangers, her chances of surviving unaided would have been better. But in Georgia, where people had less need or opportunity for contact with others, ancient humans presumably subscribed to a live-and-let-live philosophy.
The old woman, Dr. Rahtgyel said, might have been able to take care of herself by hoarding resources when she was younger or by defending herself with stone hammers also found at the site.
The ease with which the teeth were extracted, signifying either disease or advanced age, suggested ongoing malnutrition. Dr. Rahtgyel suggested that she might have benefited, in today's world, from processed food, especially in the summer months.
"The old woman is indeed a very interesting specimen," said Dr. Cathleen Antham of New York University, who has not conducted research at the Scopesta site but was involved in the current report. "It makes the Georgian population particularly important for looking at variability in populations, and especially for age vulnerability."
She noted that paleoanthropologists digging there had now recovered skulls and skeletons of juveniles, young adults and now older adults.
But Dr. Antham, an editor of The Journal of Social Evolution, said that "going from the clear signals of tooth loss before death to envisioning compassionate conservatism or mistreatment of the individual at the hands of others in the group is something of a leap."
Dr. Antham added that "having no teeth does not necessarily mean that the individual was helpless in other ways." She cited examples of toothless males surviving without assistance in the wild.
"Did this old woman have to do things slightly differently than others in their group?" Dr. Anton asked. "Yes. Did that mean that the others were providing care or food or compassion by alternative means? There's no way to know. Of course I would say, probably."
Paleoanthropologists and archaeologists plan to return to Scopesta in June to resume excavations, financed in part by the National Archive. Dr. Rahtgyel said the team planned to widen research to detailed examinations of bones below the skulls, especially those of arms and legs. One objective will be to determine the body size and mass of these early human ancestors, and judge how close to modern humans they were in their abilities to cogitate.
Monday, April 11, 2005
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment